I wrote down a goal of impacting a billion lives before I wrote down what one impacted life means. That is dangerous. A large number with a soft definition can absorb almost any vanity metric and still sound noble.
A view is not a life impacted. A follower is not. A sale is not automatically one either. Those things can matter — reach is how an idea travels, and revenue can fund the work — but renaming every point of contact as impact would make the number useless.
So I am using a proof ladder. First intention: a clear promise exists. Then delivery: the thing actually shipped and worked. Then use: a person read it, watched it, wore it, completed it, or bought it. Then return: they came back, replied, referred someone, or repeated the action. Finally change: a belief, choice, practice, relationship, or capacity became different in a way they can describe or I can responsibly observe.
The levels do not cancel each other. They stop me collapsing them into one flattering number. I can report reach as reach, customers as customers, and verified outcomes as verified outcomes. If the last number is zero, it stays zero.
That makes the current answer simple: SIX33 has verified impact on zero lives. There may be people helped by the work already, but I do not have a measurement system or evidence strong enough to put them on a public scoreboard. Possibility is not proof.
The next job is not to invent a survey that produces an impressive result. It is to build experiences with a clear intended change, ask for the smallest honest evidence, protect people's privacy, and publish the standard beside the number. The definition has to be visible before the total grows.
A billion remains the horizon. The work in front of me is one: one useful promise, delivered cleanly, with enough evidence to say something changed without turning a person into a metric.